Dataset · v1.0.0 · 5 rows

Testing method comparison

Every residential radon measurement method side by side: what it reports, how long it runs, whether it evidences its own conditions, and which decisions it can and cannot carry.

The data

MethodTypical durationWhat it reportsEvidences its own conditionsSuitable for a transactionSuitable for post-mitigation verificationBest for
Charcoal short-term kit (lab analysed)2-7 daysAverage concentration over the exposure period.falsefalsetrueAn inexpensive first measurement, and routine biennial retesting by an owner.
Alpha-track long-term detector90+ daysAverage concentration across seasons.falsefalsefalseUnderstanding the exposure you actually live with, and deciding within the 2–4 consideration band.
Continuous radon monitor (professionally deployed)2-7 daysHourly log plus an average, commonly with tamper and condition data.truetruetrueReal-estate measurement and any result likely to be disputed.
Consumer plug-in continuous monitorcontinuousRolling averages and trends over time in the owner’s own home.falsefalsefalseWatching seasonal trend, and noticing a mitigation system that has stopped performing.
Radon-in-water test2-7 daysConcentration dissolved in a private well supply.falsefalsefalseHouseholds on a private well, as a separate exposure pathway with its own treatment.

Download and API

Licence. CC BY 4.0 — reuse with attribution to Radon Connect and a link to the dataset page.

Field schema

FieldTypeDescription
methodstringMeasurement device or approach.
durationenum
2-7 days · 90+ days · continuous
How long the device is exposed.
reportsstringThe output.
evidencesConditionsbooleanWhether the output shows if closed-building conditions actually held.
transactionSuitablebooleanWhether it is normally accepted where two parties with opposing interests must both trust the number.
verificationSuitablebooleanWhether it is appropriate to prove a system worked.
bestForstringThe question this method answers well.

Methodology

The question this answers

Which radon measurement method answers which question, and which decisions can each one carry?

How a row comes to exist

  • Methods are the device classes available to a residential homeowner in the states we serve.
  • The conditions and suitability columns encode the practical distinction that matters in a dispute: whether the output evidences the test conditions or merely asserts a number.
  • Durations are the typical exposure ranges published for each device class, not manufacturer-specific specifications.

Inclusion and exclusion

  • Methods a homeowner can obtain or commission for a residential property.
  • Laboratory and research instrumentation is excluded.

What this dataset cannot tell you

  • Suitability columns reflect general practice, not a legal requirement. Where a state specifies acceptable devices for a given purpose, that specification governs.
  • No accuracy or precision figures are published. Those are device and laboratory specific, and a general claim would misrepresent them.
  • Every method depends on correct placement and closed-building conditions. A well-chosen device placed badly produces a well-documented wrong answer.

Related

Testing methods by duration and evidence

What it shows. That duration and evidentiary strength are separate axes — and only one method documents its own conditions.

Testing methods by duration and evidenceThree measurement methods compared by exposure duration on a logarithmic-feeling scale. A charcoal kit runs a few days and reports an average. A professionally deployed continuous monitor runs about two days and additionally logs hourly data evidencing whether test conditions held. An alpha-track detector runs ninety days or more and reports an annual-scale average. Only the continuous monitor evidences its own conditions, which is why transactions favour it.Charcoal kit4 daysreports an average onlyContinuous monitor2 dayslogs conditions — defensible in a disputeAlpha-track90+ daysreports an average only
Duration answers a different question from evidence. Only one method shows whether the conditions during the test actually held.

Authored as SVG in this repository, with real text nodes and a long description for screen readers. Reusable under CC BY 4.0 — see the diagram library.

Sources

  1. U.S. EPA Radon
  2. U.S. EPA A Citizen’s Guide to Radon
  3. U.S. EPA Home Buyer’s and Seller’s Guide to Radon

Get quotes from credentialed local contractors

Free to request and no obligation. We verify credentials with the issuing authority before any request routes to a contractor.

Start a request